Thomas Beale wrote: > Andrew Patterson wrote: > >> Sam, without putting words in Adams mouth, I think he was asking about >> the precedence of include/exclude sections. It is a common problem is >> coming up with rule system like this - for instance one can look at the >> allow/deny pattern of the apache2.conf file for how to setup IP address >> ranges. In the apache case, there is an explicit clause that allows the >> order to be changed - either allow first then deny, or deny first then allow. >> >> In the ADL spec, this is mentioned as a "yet to be defined" (section 5.3.8). >> >> > Indeed. I don't think the requirements have been adequately defined, so > this remains one of the few little holes to plug properly in ADL. > > - thomas > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >
I am assuming allow then deny i.e. include all, exclude all = include all. Otherwise...exclude all becomes somewhere between pointless & dangerous. Adam ********************************************************************** This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies. Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation. NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million messages are sent every day by the system. To find out why more and more NHS personnel are switching to this NHS Connecting for Health system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail **********************************************************************
