Hi TimmyX
an acXXXX constraint has been designed for defining terminology value
sets by query.
In your case several constraining the text ELEMENT to several at codes
should do the job (the Archetype Editor supports that via 'internal
codes' in the constraints tab right to the definition area.
Something like that should do
ITEM_TREE[at0003] matches { -- Tree
items
cardinality matches {0..*; unordered} matches {
CLUSTER[at0004] occurrences matches {0..1} matches { -- Top
items cardinality matches {0..*; unordered} matches {
ELEMENT[at0005] occurrences matches {0..1} matches { --
Default Spoken
value matches {
DV_CODED_TEXT matches {
defining_code matches {
[local::
at0006, -- bla
at0007] -- blub
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Regarding sub elements you were right: CLUSTERS are the way to do that
in Archetypes! If you have a pattern which is always the same, you
could create a CLUSTER-Archetype and reuse it...
Cheers, Thilo
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:58 AM, TimmyX <TimmyX at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Within the context of my bachelor thesis, i am trying to transform a domain
> model into an archetype, but now i am having some problems and i hope maybe
> some of you here can help me.
>
> My first question is, is it possible to define constant or "hard coded"
> values ie. constant text which contains a description?
> So far I am trying to add a CODED_TEXT that matches a defined constraint
> ac0001, but i am not sure if this is a valid solution.
>
> ITEM_TREE[at0003] matches { -- ITEM_TREE
> items cardinality matches {0..*; unordered} matches {
> CLUSTER[at0004] occurrences matches {0..1} matches {
> -- Top
> items cardinality matches {0..*; unordered}
> matches {
> ELEMENT[at0005] occurrences matches
> {0..1} matches { -- SpokenDefault
> value matches {
> DV_CODED_TEXT matches
> {
> defining_code
> matches {[ac0001]} -- Top
> }
> }
>
> and the other question
> How do i add "sub-elements", is it even possible? ie. I have a Text field
> "Top" and i want to add a Text field "SpokenDefault" to it, which shows how
> to pronounce the word Top. the way i do it right now is creating a cluster
> for every "element" which is not very effective.
>
> thanks in advance
> TimmyX
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Constant-Values-and-%22sub%22-Elements-tp17053994p17053994.html
> Sent from the openehr-technical mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
