While implementing ARCHETYPE objects I ran into an odd thing. Maybe I am missing something or there is a mistake in the documentation?
The ontology attribute of ARCHETYPE is of the type ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY. The AOM then says that the attribute ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY.parent_archetype is of type ARCHETYPE and it is described as the; "Archetype which owns this ontology." Is that REALLY what it should be or should ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY.parent_archetype be an ARCHETYPE_ID? Thanks, Tim -- Timothy Cook, MSc Health Informatics Research & Development Services LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook Skype ID == timothy.cook ************************************************************** *You may get my Public GPG key from popular keyservers or * *from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home* ************************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080507/a054711c/attachment.asc>
