Tim Cook wrote: > While implementing ARCHETYPE objects I ran into an odd thing. Maybe I > am missing something or there is a mistake in the documentation? > > The ontology attribute of ARCHETYPE is of the type ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY. > The AOM then says that the attribute ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY.parent_archetype > is of type ARCHETYPE and it is described as the; "Archetype which owns > this ontology." > > Is that REALLY what it should be or should > ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY.parent_archetype be an ARCHETYPE_ID? > > Thanks, > Tim > *Tim,
this attribute is populated in memory when an archetype is deserialised, so it points to the actual ARCHETYPE object. In almost every case (of the few that there are) that there is a 'parent' reference, it works like this. - thomas *
