>From 5.1.5.2

> A further situation in which text values - this time
> plain text - is mapped to equivalent terms is when
> natural language processing is used to generate
> coded terms for existing free-text prose. The aim of
> such processing is to detect word phrases and
> associate them with a coded term of the same meaning,
> without obliterating the original text. In this case,
> an instance of DV_CODED_TEXT is associated with
>an instance of DV_TEXT via the mappings attribute.

I'm just wondering about the wording of this bit of the
spec - is that really meant to be DV_CODED_TEXT?
The mappings attribute holds CODE_PHRASES, so
in what way is an instance of DV_CODED_TEXT
associated with the DV_TEXT?

Andrew

Reply via email to