Andrew Patterson wrote: > >From 5.1.5.2 > > >> A further situation in which text values - this time >> plain text - is mapped to equivalent terms is when >> natural language processing is used to generate >> coded terms for existing free-text prose. The aim of >> such processing is to detect word phrases and >> associate them with a coded term of the same meaning, >> without obliterating the original text. In this case, >> an instance of DV_CODED_TEXT is associated with >> an instance of DV_TEXT via the mappings attribute. >> > > I'm just wondering about the wording of this bit of the > spec - is that really meant to be DV_CODED_TEXT? > The mappings attribute holds CODE_PHRASES, so > in what way is an instance of DV_CODED_TEXT > associated with the DV_TEXT? > > * Hi Andrew,
yes, that is a typo. Since it is extremely minor, I will propose to the ARB to correct it in the imminent Release 1.0.2 issue of the specifications. - thomas beale *
