Thanks, Pablo!

Let's continue our discussion on the wiki and raise a CR for the
support RM specs if it's not done already.

Cheers,
Rong

2009/12/4 pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com>:
> Hi rong,
> When I saw the API and the structure of the openehr_terminology_en I thought
> "something is wrong here", then I see the Java Ref Impl of the mini termserv
> with your comments about methods that can't be implemented with this
> terminology model, here I think "I'm right" :D
> If you want we can discuss the topic on the mail list or on the wiki, I
> think we can correct the model in a few weeks, making an implementable and
> usable model/API.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Pablo.
>
> BTW: congrats for you PHD!
>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:06:05 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Questions about terminology model
>> From: rong.acode at gmail.com
>> To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
>>
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> Yes, you are right. Code sets are language independent. See my comment
>> in the java implementation:
>>
>>
>> http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_java/TRUNK/mini-termserv/src/main/java/org/openehr/terminology/SimpleCodeSetAccess.java
>>
>> I think I have created an JIRA issue on this but couldn't find it now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rong
>>
>> 2009/11/28 pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com>:
>> > I need to implement the access for various terminologies, included the
>> > OpenEHR terminology.
>> >
>> > I've derived a class model from the openehr_terminology_en.xml but it
>> > seems
>> > this model is not compatible with the API proposed in support_im.pdf
>> >
>> > As an example, in openehr_terminology_en.xml, "terminology" is the only
>> > element that has a language, but in support_im.pdf, the CODE_SET_ACCESS
>> > class has an operation has_lang( lang ), but the code sets have no
>> > language
>> > to do this search. I have a question here, is it correct that a code set
>> > have a language? and code sets and codes are not language independent?
>> >
>> > I think the only "language-dependent item" is the description of the
>> > code,
>> > so I think that both openehr_terminology_en.xml and support_im.pdf have
>> > some
>> > bugs to fix, is it correct?
>> >
>> > And here are questions based on my ignorance, what's the difference
>> > between
>> > Group and CodeSet? and what's the difference between Code and Concept?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot,
>> > Pablo Pazos Gutierrez
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they
>> > e-mail you.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > openEHR-technical mailing list
>> > openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
> ________________________________
> Keep your friends updated? even when you?re not signed in.
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>


Reply via email to