I need to implement the access for various terminologies, included the OpenEHR
terminology.
I've derived a class model from the openehr_terminology_en.xml but it seems
this model is not compatible with the API proposed in support_im.pdf
As an example, in openehr_terminology_en.xml, "terminology" is the only element
that has a language, but in support_im.pdf, the CODE_SET_ACCESS class has an
operation has_lang( lang ), but the code sets have no language to do this
search. I have a question here, is it correct that a code set have a language?
and code sets and codes are not language independent?
I think the only "language-dependent item" is the description of the code, so I
think that both openehr_terminology_en.xml and support_im.pdf have some bugs to
fix, is it correct?
And here are questions based on my ignorance, what's the difference between
Group and CodeSet? and what's the difference between Code and Concept?
Thanks a lot,
Pablo Pazos Gutierrez
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail
you.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_3:092010
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20091127/7159bef4/attachment.html>
