Heath Frankel wrote: > Hi Tim, > Thank you for your post, I complete agree. Like you I am not a clinician > and feel that I am rocking the establishment of openEHR and the principles > of Archetypes by saying this, but I strongly believe that we need to have a > technical review process of archetypes before they are published. ... > > Please understand that I not trying to re-empower the technician, I am > simply looking for good quality knowledge artefacts and believe this a > process that is missing in the current archetype development process. >
I think it behoves us tech-heads to get involved. I (and others) have been invited six months ago to help the CKM publishing process by "adopting an archetype". I'm guilty of not having found the time to do so. - Peter
