Alberto, at the large reference model, there are differences. But at the level of an Entry on OpenEHR and a clinical statement in HL7 v3, I have not seen other problems than only technical changes. Semantically the way data are expressed and linked to codes are similar. A clinicial statement does allow to include relationships between variables, for instance like in assessment scales (Apgar, Glasgow COma etc). That should be added on the level of an archetype if that information needs to be send. But normally five Apgar values and the sixt Apgar total at point X in time can be sent as a set of 6 HL7 v3 clinical statements following exactly the archetype format.
Met vriendelijke groet, Results 4 Care b.v. dr. William TF Goossen directeur De Stinse 15 3823 VM Amersfoort email: Results4Care at cs.com email: williamtfgoossen at cs.com telefoon +31 (0)654614458 fax +31 (0)33 2570169 Kamer van Koophandel nummer: 32133713 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100131/ebbdcf6d/attachment.html>
