Op 10 feb 2010, om 11:37 heeft Gerard Freriks het volgende geschreven:

> It is imperative that DCM's are absolutely free to use and in the public 
> domain. CEN/ISO and ANSI assure that with the standardisation IP rules in 
> general.
> DCM's must be absolutely free from IP problems, well maintained in a formal, 
> flexible, organisation, owned and controlled by all that use them.
> OpenEHR as we know it today is a private company. (See under Status: 
> http://www.openehr.org/about/foundation.html)

Hi Gerard,


What has happened? For years and years you have been the initiator of many 
disputes between 13606/openEHR and HL7 and now all over sudden openEHR seems to 
have become the 'enemy'. 

OpenEHR is a not-for profit organisation and it's knowlegde is in the open 
domain. If you had Googled around a litte bit you could have found the 
following:

A company limited by guarantee is an alternative type of incorporation used 
primarily for non-profit organisations that require corporate status. A 
guarantee company does not have a share capital, but has members who are 
guarantors instead of shareholders. The guarantors give an undertaking to 
contribute a nominal amount towards the winding up of the company in the event 
of a shortfall upon cessation of business. It cannot distribute its profits to 
its members, and is therefore eligible to apply for charitable status if 
necessary. 

So I would like you to withdraw this unfunded accusation or provide some solid 
facts to prove the contrary. This really doesn't help the discussion.

I do like the fact that you've turned around and see opportunities to harmonize 
HL7, 13606 and openEHR, so let's keep working on that track.


Cheers,


Stef

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100210/113227be/attachment.html>

Reply via email to