On 11-Mar-10 12:59, Stef Verlinden wrote: > For those of you interested in the 'problems' within Snomed as an ontology, > here (http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3465/version/1) you can find a > good and recent article describing them. This doesn't mean we shouldn't use > Snomed, but knowing where the problems are is helpful to find solutions as > Thomas already stated.
Nice work!
