Hi Erik, On 19/03/2010 11:29, Erik Sundvall wrote: > Hi! > > I just wanted to warn people using UML linked or derived from... > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/computable/UML/uml.html > ...that the old class MERGED_VERSION class still in UML files although > it has been removed from the specification documents (and VERSION plus > subclasses are a bit different) >
you mean the UML XMI zip file? I was not aware of that, since the generated HTML is correct - http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0.1/Browsable/_9_0_76d0249_1109326589721_134411_997Report.html which implies that the XMI is out of sync with the HTML generated from it! As we have no way of working with this old XMI / UML (it is an old version of MagicDraw) we are stuck until a re-engineered model such as yours in the EMF framework is available. > The problem includes UML-generation described at > http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/dev/Experimental+generation+of+code+and+documentation+from+UML > (same as tiny link http://www.openehr.org/wiki/x/OwAt) > > I don't know if the problem is present in the files at... > http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TAGS/Release-1.0.2/architecture/computable/UML/MagicDraw/ > ...since I have not generated diagrams from them, but the phrase > MERGED_VERSION is at least present in the zipped XML file there. > I wonder if that is some historic tool artefact? > P.s. A side question: > It seems impossble to add attestations to IMPORTED_VERSIONs, this > sounds reasonable (e.g. due to problems syncing back those > attestations to other systems without creating a new original > version). > on the contrary, you can - see http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0.1/Browsable/_9_0_76d0249_1109326589721_134411_997Report.html * * - thomas beale -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100322/bd9b84ef/attachment.html>
