Hi Erik, On 22/03/2010 20:45, Erik Sundvall wrote: > > The particular diagram you refer to has the MERGED_VERSION removed > from it, but it has not been removed from the underlying XMI-files and > is thus available as > http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0.1/Browsable/_9_5_1_76d0249_1140019952491_116477_6153Report.html >
interesting....well, I am just waiting to move to a nice new clean UML expression, so this problem will evaporate ;-) > (And the 1.0.1 in the URL and some html page headings is a bit > confusing if this is 1.0.2 :-) > well this bit was intentional (maybe a bad decision) the idea was to indicate that the UML was stuck on 1.0.1 (it is....) > Erik asked: > >> P.s. A side question: >> It seems impossble to add attestations to IMPORTED_VERSIONs, this >> sounds reasonable (e.g. due to problems syncing back those >> attestations to other systems without creating a new original >> version). >> > Tom answered: > >> on the contrary, you can - see >> http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0.1/Browsable/_9_0_76d0249_1109326589721_134411_997Report.html >> > I trusted the specification to be more correct than the UML link you > refer to. Look at figure 7 (page 38) in > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/common_im.pdf > and the text/tables in chapter 6.5 > The XML specification also follows the1.0.2 common im spec document > and puts attestations only under ORIGINAL_VERSION, not at the VERSION > level as the UML you refer to. See > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/its/XML-schema/documentation/Version.xsd.html > > It was via the mismatch between the XML spec and my generated UML > diagram I found the differences and then looked in the spec PDF > document... > You have got me there. I think the decision was that 'attestation' is only a meaningful concept on original content, i.e. because it is to do with some medical professional signing off on the content. So the UML is broken here. You should always trust the PDF ;-) Thanks for bringing up these errors. In general, the PDF UML (although not even built using a tool!) is 99.5% dependable, with most errors found by now (actually prior to 1.0.2). - thomas * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100323/bf453666/attachment.html>
