Thanks Heather I see from the "clinical" proposal how the 4 sessions on the Saturday are to be split... Session 1: Introduction Break Session 2: Focus on Archetypes Lunch Session 3: Focus on Templates Break Session 4: openEHR in action My reading of this is that there will be a mix of clinical and technical language used to step through these sessions, which if done well should be fine.
#Suggestion #1 Within the clinical workshop, I expect novice clinicians to come with a common clinical requirement in mind and be keen to see how that ends up at the UI layer, where the vast majority of clinicians meets the technology.. ie 1.Assume we should be taking a common requirement, eg Patient Summary 2.explore related archetypes required, eg in CKM 3.creation of related template 4.exposure of said template at UI layer.. (While I'm cc'ing the technical list in here, how much technical debate do the technical community expect will be generated by this "clinical" proposal? The current state of the template spec and the challenge of translating archetypes and templates into the UI layer comes to mind and could get quite technical...) Also my sense is that the developers session on the Monday will replay many of these issues, which is why I'm suggesting ... #Suggestion #2 we need to coordinate between these sessions to ensure a consistent message and the highlights from the pre-conference sessions can be "replayed" during the intra-conference session.. Regards, Tony Heather Leslie wrote: > I'm very happy to receive your advice on this. > > We have a great opportunity with the full day workshop and afternoon > technical workshop, however I don't feel that we have total freedom to > rearrange our proposed workshop plan. > > We have provided an outline of the proposed plan and included the > statement that the full day clinical modelling workshop assumes no > previous knowledge of openEHR, that it will be clinical modelling > focused, clinicians are encouraged to attend, and there are explicit > 'educational goals'. This information will be used by potential > attendees to choose whether to attend or not, so to transform the > program significantly is probably not advisable. The most flexibility > is probably in the final session where we aim to show openEHR in real use. > > What are your suggestions in order to achieve best outcomes? > > Cheers > > Heather > > On 12/05/2010 7:53 AM, Tony Shannon wrote: >> Thanks Eric, Koray, Shinji, Heather, Seref, >> >> The way the programme outlines openEHR sessions looks ripe for potential >> confusion... >> >> A search of the draft programme by keyword highlights openEHR 5 times, >> (#1-4) openEHR sessions I-IV over the day on the Saturday 11th September >> (#5) openEHR developers session on the evening of Monday 13th September >> >> >> I'd suggest that the clinical and technical sides of the openEHR >> community need to agree between us how to blend our efforts together to >> get the best value for our time and those that want to come and learn. >> >> >> >> The best format that comes to mind would be to; >> -A) use to 4 sessions on the precongress tutorial on the Saturday 11th >> to explore how healthcare can change for the better with openEHR over >> those 4 sessions, by blending the "clinical workshop" proposal with the >> "openEHR developers workshop" proposal in successive stages over the day.. >> something along the lines of... Context & Intro re need for change; >> Clinical/Technical Requirements -->Design/Build --> and then >> Implementation + Clinical/Technical Benefits of openEHR >> >> -B) take the highlights of that day, with clinical + technical blend >> into a single session for replay on the Monday 13th, to the different >> audience that can be anticipated on that first day of the formal conference. >> >> I appreciate that might be seen to be disruptive of the existing >> proposals, but I'm sure they can be blended effectively. >> >> I'm thinking of the novice to openEHR who will want to come away with an >> understanding of how clinicians and technical folk can work together to >> get a job done and a view that the openEHR approach is the way to go... >> >> Happy to get bounced back on this. We havent had enough debate on this >> list of late, so again I'm trying to provoke! >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Tony >> >> Dr. Tony Shannon >> Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals >> Clinical Lead for Informatics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals >> Chair, Clinical Review Board, openEHR Foundation >> +44.789.988 5068 tony.shannon at nhs.net >> >> >> Erik Sundvall wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> The recently published preliminary Medinfo 2010 programme at... >>> http://www.medinfo2010.org/docs/Draft_Conference_Programme.pdf >>> ...lists two openEHR tutorials in parallel... >>> 1. OpenEHR I - IV (Saturday 11 September 9:00-17:00) >>> 2. EHR implementation tips I-II (Saturday 11 September 9:00-12:30) >>> >>> If I understand the content of the tutorials correctly, these are >>> renamed versions of the ones mentioned on... >>> http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/MedInfo+2010+-+South+Africa >>> 1. Clinical Modeling Workshop Proposal >>> 2. The openEHR developers' workshop >>> >>> If so, then I think it would be advantageous for somebody interested >>> in openEHR to first attend 1 and then if they have a technical >>> implementation interest to also attend 2. >>> >>> Is there an interest among the openEHR community in asking the >>> organizing comitte to move #2 to sunday the 12:th instead or does it >>> not matter for most of you? >>> >>> I'll send a copy of this mail to info at medinfo2010.org as an early >>> notice, and then sum up the response from the lists and/or comments on >>> http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/MedInfo+2010+-+South+Africa >>> in a follow up mail later. >>> >>> In addition to the reason above, about #2 partially building on >>> understanding possible to gain in #1, it is also rather tricky >>> flight-wise, but hopefully possible, for some of us involved in #2 to >>> be there in time on the morning the 11:th. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Erik Sundvall >>> erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ Tel: +46-13-286733 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openEHR-clinical mailing list >>> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org >>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical >>> >>> >> -- >> >> >> ******************************************************************************************************************** >> >> This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the >> intended recipient please inform the >> sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. >> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or >> take any action in reliance on its contents: >> to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. >> >> Thank you for your co-operation. >> >> NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS >> staff in England and Scotland >> NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive >> information with NHSmail and GSI recipients >> NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be >> accessed anywhere >> For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit >> www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail >> >> ******************************************************************************************************************** >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-clinical mailing list >> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org >> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical >> >> > > -- > > *Dr Heather Leslie* > MBBS FRACGP FACHI > Director of Clinical Modelling > *Ocean Informatics <http://www.oceaninformatics.com/>* > Phone (Aust) +61 (0)418 966 670 > Skype - heatherleslie > Twitter - @omowizard -- Dr. Tony Shannon Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Clinical Lead for Informatics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Chair, Clinical Review Board, openEHR Foundation +44.789.988 5068 tony.shannon at nhs.net ******************************************************************************************************************** This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your co-operation. NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSI recipients NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail ********************************************************************************************************************
