Hi! A question regarding naming/identifiers.
According to http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/am/archetype_semantics.pdf parts of the grammar for identifiers is... archetype_id: qualified_rm_entity ?.? domain_concept ?.? version_id qualified_rm_entity: rm_originator ?-? rm_name ?-? rm_entity_name domain_concept: concept_name { ?-? specialisation }* Surely you must just have been sloppy in... http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge2/TRUNK/archetypes/openEHR_examples/link_archetypes/ ...where the identifiers as of this writing (Revision 20) are: openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis.v1.adls openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis_sweden.v1.adls openEHR-EHR-LINK.indication.v1.adls Should not the identifiers instead be: openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem-diagnosis.v1.adls openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem-diagnosis-sweden.v1.adls openEHR-EHR-LINK.indication.v1.adls Or have the identifier syntax and semantics requirements changed in ADL/AOM 1.5? I hope note, because that would make AQL querying implementation a lot harder when asking for an archetype including any of it's speicialisations... Isn't there any automatic check in AWB that specialisation identifiers are correct? Best regards, Erik Sundvall erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/? Tel: +46-13-286733
