In ADL 1.5 they are - you can name the archetype files however you like, and put them where you like.
- thomas On 28/10/2010 09:46, Diego Bosc? wrote: > Shouldn't archetype identifiers and file names be separated? > > 2010/10/28 Peter Gummer<peter.gummer at oceaninformatics.com>: >> Erik Sundvall wrote: >> >>> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls >>> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis.v1.adls >>> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis_sweden.v1.adls >>> openEHR-EHR-LINK.indication.v1.adls >>> >>> Should not the identifiers instead be: >>> >>> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls >>> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem-diagnosis.v1.adls >>> openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem-diagnosis-sweden.v1.adls >>> openEHR-EHR-LINK.indication.v1.adls >>> >>> Or have the identifier syntax and semantics requirements changed in >>> ADL/AOM 1.5? * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101028/466330a1/attachment.html>
