Yes, I was saying that I find the tool user friendly. I thought the 'Great work!' comment would have given that away. :)
I have updated the issue to match the 'beta 5' version. Thanks! On 12/01/2011 12:36 PM, Thomas Beale wrote: > > Not sure if you are saying the ADL Workbench is user friendly or not, > but we are certainly trying to make things better. I have updated the > PR tracker to have beta 4 and beta 5, so issues reported as of the > current beta can record 'ADL workbench beta 5' now. Sorry for the > problem there. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > I've downloaded the tool and played around with it a little. Great > work! I really think a lack of (freely available) user friendly tools > are a big factor holding back adoption. > > I don't have my own archetypes developed, so for now I just played > around with the RM models. While submitting an issue > <http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/AWBPR-19> with JIRA, I noticed > that ADL 1.5 beta 3 is the latest release tag there.. maybe you should > add the more recent ones as well? > > Regards, > > Mihai > > > -- > - thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111201/3d875724/attachment.html>
