Ok, was not sure, because from my point of view, this particular tool is only just gettinng there ;-)
- thomas ~~~~~~~~ Yes, I was saying that I find the tool user friendly. I thought the 'Great work!' comment would have given that away. :) I have updated the issue to match the 'beta 5' version. Thanks! On 12/01/2011 12:36 PM, Thomas Beale wrote: Not sure if you are saying the ADL Workbench is user friendly or not, but we are certainly trying to make things better. I have updated the PR tracker to have beta 4 and beta 5, so issues reported as of the current beta can record 'ADL workbench beta 5' now. Sorry for the problem there. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I've downloaded the tool and played around with it a little. Great work! I really think a lack of (freely available) user friendly tools are a big factor holding back adoption. I don't have my own archetypes developed, so for now I just played around with the RM models. While submitting an issue<http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/AWBPR-19>with JIRA, I noticed that ADL 1.5 beta 3 is the latest release tag there.. maybe you should add the more recent ones as well? Regards, Mihai -- - thomas _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing listopenEHR-technical at openehr.orghttp://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing listopenEHR-technical at openehr.orghttp://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -- - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111201/80e0d1d7/attachment.html>
