Hi! Let the battle begin :-) see: http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/2011/AOM-beauty-contest.html
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 13:24, Thomas Beale < thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > actually, ADL 2.0 as reported in this document is now obsolete. The ADL > 1.5 compiler already does this, and will use it as a fast save/retrieve > format. > Will cADL become optional or go away somehow? One area where dADL beats JSON and YAML (I think) is its better support for > Xpath-like paths. > Why would that be different? I guess most path queries will run on instantiated object trees rather than on documents and then there is no difference - and if paths were run directly on documents, then please explain why dADL would support them better. > Plus its much more compact than JSON. > Much? Less noisy I would agree to though. > Personally I find YAML hard to read because there are so many syntax > elements (triple '-', triple '.' etc) but that might just be me. > Have a look at... http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/2011/AOM-beauty-contest.html ...again. The triple '-' and triple '.' are (mostly optional) start and end markers of documents that make life easier when concatenating streams/documents, see the YAML specification. Am I the only one that thinks YAML is more readable than dADL? Best regards, Erik Sundvall erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ Tel: +46-13-286733 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111201/2dfec204/attachment.html>
