Hi Erik, I want to implement some simplifications of the item_structure in the EHRGen ( http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/ ) we talked about this: http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-clinical/msg02231.html My focus is on the persistence layer, because we persist data using an ORM (object-relational mapping) component, and the complexity of the relational schema is proportional to the complexity of the object model. BTW, the EHRGen has the complete cicle of information implemented: automatic gui generation (based on archetypes and our gui templates), data validation against archetype constraints, data binding (creation of RM structures from user data input and archetypes), persistence of those structures, and getting data to show on a GUI. Now I'm experimenting with semantic queries (common SQL but based on arcehtype ids and paths).
Regards,Pablo. > Regarding the RM I know Tom is experimenting with simplified > ITEM_STRUCTURE as a BMM-schema for the AWB. Are there any other > RM-redesign experiments going on anywhere? > > What is happening in the 13606-world regarding thoughts about > practical datatypes? > > What about (optional) reusable ENTRY subtypes in the 13606 world? (see > http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-technical/msg05285.html > under the heading "2. OBSERVATION et. al. (ISO 13606 CR)") -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111215/428ef9aa/attachment.html>
