I have started a wiki page <http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/openEHR+2.x+RM+proposals+-+lower+information+model> for this 'lower RM' simplification. The top contains the existing models, feel free to add to the 'problem' list (why are we simplifying?). If you have a candidate solution to offer, please put it under a new heading - you will see a 'Candidate B' ready to be used by someone. If we proceed in that fashion, I think we can keep the proposals clear.
NOTE: I have only half done my proposal, Candidate A, so don't bother looking at it yet. - thomas On 15/12/2011 14:54, pablo pazos wrote: > Hi Erik, > > I want to implement some simplifications of the item_structure in the > EHRGen ( http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/ ) we talked > about this: > http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-clinical/msg02231.html > > My focus is on the persistence layer, because we persist data using an > ORM (object-relational mapping) component, and the complexity of the > relational schema is proportional to the complexity of the object model. > > BTW, the EHRGen has the complete cicle of information implemented: > automatic gui generation (based on archetypes and our gui templates), > data validation against archetype constraints, data binding (creation > of RM structures from user data input and archetypes), persistence of > those structures, and getting data to show on a GUI. > > Now I'm experimenting with semantic queries (common SQL but based on > arcehtype ids and paths). > > > Regards, > Pablo. > > > Regarding the RM I know Tom is experimenting with simplified > > ITEM_STRUCTURE as a BMM-schema for the AWB. Are there any other > > RM-redesign experiments going on anywhere? > > > > What is happening in the 13606-world regarding thoughts about > > practical datatypes? > > > > What about (optional) reusable ENTRY subtypes in the 13606 world? (see > > http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-technical/msg05285.html > > under the heading "2. OBSERVATION et. al. (ISO 13606 CR)") > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111215/a48de33d/attachment.html>
