Thomas Beale wrote: > What probably does make sense anyway is to relax the spec in ADL 1.5 > to allow both forms (and one day, probably we get rid of the URI > form). Does that seem reasonable?
This would mean, then, a revision to section 8.3.1 of the AOM 1.5 spec. Currently it says that ARCHETYPE_ONTOLOGY.constraint_bindings contains DV_URI objects. - Peter
