Hi Thomas,
I would disagree that the version of ICD-10 is "10". Even terminology systems
like ICD-10 are revised (for example in Sweden once a year) and released in
different releases. I therefore think that is fair to handle ICD-9 and ICD-10
as different systems in the same way as SNOMED RT and SNOMED CT are.
Greetings,
Mikael
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: den 21 februari 2011 12:36
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: constraint binding error
On 21/02/2011 04:14, pablo pazos wrote:
Hi Michael,
Not every terminology version is a date. In ICD 10, the version is "10". I
think the version to be a valid date is not a problem here.
most people consider ICD10 as simply a different terminology from ICD9. There
are variants like ICD10AM, ICD9CM and so on... and in theory, there are no
'versions' of these terminologies, at least as far as I know - WHO issues once
and that's it (not sure about the AM and CM releases though).
- thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110221/5668713b/attachment.html>
