On 21/03/2011 11:40, Diego Bosc? wrote: > But then if we want to communicate this coded string outside from our > openEHR system would be impossible to know 100% what it is.
well don't forget that the terminology_id attribute is telling you what terminology it is, so it should always be the case that the code_string is interpretable given the terminology. Now, if we start having multiple syntaxes or ways of expressing a post-coordination for a given terminology, something else is going to be needed. > I don't > get the point of having 'mappings' (which could also be done by a > terminology service) and not having a 'qualifiers' or whatever. A mapping can be applied to a coded or uncoded data item, e.g. an ICD10 billing code attached to a much more specific SNOMED code, or just to a piece of text. Don't forget, 'coding' is still largely done as a post hoc exercise in hospitals by special people who do only that, and who are essentially responsible for choosing the 'right' codes so that the hospital gets properly remunerated for the procedure done. So this is openEHR's way of representing that. This kind of mapping can't be done by a terminology service, because it is not a definitive mapping in the sense that you would find inside the terminology service - the latter kind of mapping might map the SCT concept 'fracture of femur' to an ICD code meaning the same thing, or as close as possible. But the 'mapping' attribute in openEHR allows the coders within a hospital (or the original consultant) to put a code like 'long bone fracture' chosen from ICD, which has been determined as the correct billing code. > Doesn't Loinc also allow post-coordination? well LOINC is a kind of post-coordination system, with 6 axes. A LOINC code and a LOINC 'post-coordination' are more or less the same thing (you can have wildcards etc in LOINC). hope this clarifies - thomas* * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110321/5e604616/attachment.html>
