On 14/11/2011 15:41, Erik Sundvall wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 06:23, Heath Frankel > <heath.frankel at oceaninformatics.com > <mailto:heath.frankel at oceaninformatics.com>> wrote: > > However, others may not be so keen on this as those starting out > with openEHR like to use the built-in development tools in their > favourite IDE to generate classes that match the AM/RM and > automatically serialize data. > > > Yes. Please do not exclude the current verbose > RM-mimicking XML-formats from a future version update since they > certainly have a value too. They are for example very nice when you > want to map AQL to xPath (and xQuery) and for generating stubs in > programming languages. > > Is there anything stopping us from having more than > one serialization alternative per formalism, e.g. both verbose and > compact XML?
I knew someone would say that ;-) - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111114/c709d8be/attachment.html>
