Congratulations to you and your team, Pablo,
A great achievement. It is so pleasing to see you so active and involved. I absolutely endorse your desire to get some quality certification behind any openEHR training. In my opinion it should be done under the auspice of the Foundation, and given the changes anticipated perhaps this will be something that can be part of the new Board?s vision, but this is definitely not a trivial task. As a community, I would love to see us start taking some of the initial baby steps to work towards this, mindful that a fully accredited program will likely take time and significant resources. My reservations reiterate largely Ian?s comments ? we have done numerous training programs over the past 5 years. Our training material has evolved significantly to reflect the changes in tooling and development of templates, querying, CKM etc to support the practical use and implementation. While this is still in a state of significant flux, and it is likely to be so for some years still, the training will be harder to standardise, but will become gradually easier. In addition, each of our training courses has been configured to reflect the needs/desires of the attendees and this creates an additional overhead that needs consideration. Cheers Heather From: [email protected] [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of pablo pazos Sent: Friday, 6 January 2012 4:51 AM To: openehr technical; openehr clinical Subject: RE: Outcomes & conclusions of the openEHR course in spanish (& ideas for the future) Hi everyone! I've updated my post adding the students evaluation of the course: <http://www.linkedin.com/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Finformatica-medica%2Eblog spot%2Ecom%2F2012%2F01%2Fconclusiones-del-curso-de-openehr-en%2Ehtml&urlhash =LzKZ&_t=tracking_disc> MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "www.linkedin.com" claiming to be http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/2012/01/conclusiones-del-curso-de-ope nehr-en.html For being the first edition, the evaluation was quite positive. But we still have a lot of things to improve! -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos _____ From: [email protected] To: openehr-clinical at openehr.org; openehr-technical at openehr.org; openehr-implementers at openehr.org Subject: Outcomes & conclusions of the openEHR course in spanish (& ideas for the future) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:14:41 -0300 Hi everyone, Recently we have ended the first edition of the course with a huge success. And now we are thinking about the next steps to take. Here is a post on my blog about the conclusions and future actions: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/2012/01/conclusiones-del-curso-de-ope nehr-en.html (yo can see it in english by clicking ENGLISH on the top right corner of the blog). I want to share with the community a couple of ideas mentioned there. It would be very nice to know what you think. openEHR certification: The first idea is on standarizing openEHR training, and to think about an openEHR certification. I think this could be very good for the community and for the openEHR organization too. It could be possible to create a mail list for openEHR trainers (openehr-trainers at openehr.org)? So we could discuss about the topics and ways of evaluation, and come out with an standard minimal program to all openEHR courses. If we reach a standard minimal program for openEHR courses, could we get formal support from openEHR.org to issue internationally valid openEHR certificates? (obviously this is a question for the future, but IMO we need to start thinking about it now). 10 projects to adopt openEHR: We thought about 10 projects (or so) in two areas: software and clinical modeling. Because openEHR propose a tool-chain based process of creating EHRs, we need to have each one of the links of that chain in order to adopt and implement openEHR easily. Now there is a little tooling available, and some of it is not open source. In projects at a national level we need to use open source software, because each country will need to make it's own customizations to each tool. In the other hand, we need to model other things that are clinical knowledge too, like processes and rules to enable CDS, in order to support full EHR implementation (e.g. I think we could recommend ways to express rules based on archetype ids and paths, and create software tools to support that specification, but we need to work the openEHR services specs first....). There is a diagram on my blog post that shows the tools we propose to 1. develope if there is no tool that support its functionality or it's closed-source, 2. improve the current open source tools. On the clinical modeling side, we have engaged doctors and nurses on the creation and translation of archetypes. Now there are two of our students that already commited archetypes to the CKM: Dr. Domingo Liotta and Dr. Leonardo Der Jachadurian. I hope we could propose to create prototypes of those projects in out local universities and coordinate the projects so we do not overlap each other, with the objective of completing the tool chain with open source developments. What do you think? -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120106/07e0fd3d/attachment.html>
