Hi,

I found both left recursion as well as other aspects of ANTLR quite
tricky esp as I had very little experience with ANTRL and grammars in
general. 
There is also no "quick and dirty" way to do it - books on the subject
are quite hefty :-(
Anyway, I am really looking forward to another ANTLR grammar - perhaps
we can merge both at the end and come out with one that works for really
all cases.

Kind regards,
Bostjan
  
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 11:10 +0000, Seref Arikan wrote:

> Thanks Mikael, 
> I've also found left recursion to be less of a problem as I focused on
> the grammar. The details, and especially the division of tasks between
> lexer and parser in Antlr is what is tricky, as you've also pointed
> out. 
> 
> I decided to keep working on my version without peeking at any other
> work, to see what comes out of that (probably lots of things to laugh
> at). There is now already an Antlr grammar out there, thanks to
> Marand, but I find the idea of having multiple works out there very
> exciting. 2012 has certainly started well for the openEHR community!
> 
> Best regards
> Seref
> 
> 
> 
> 2012/1/13 Mikael Nystr?m <mikael.nystrom at liu.se>
> 
>         Hi,
>         
>          
>         
>         I used the standard approach for rewriting left recursion to
>         non left recursion described in computer grammar books (and in
>         Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_recursion).  It
>         was a quite straight forward translation, but it was necessary
>         to be careful with all the details. :-) We will share the
>         grammar when we have cleaned up the file a little more.
>         
>          
>         
>                                      Regards,
>         
>                                      Mikael
>         
>          
>         
>          
>         
>         
>         From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org
>         [mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of
>         Erik Sundvall
>         Sent: den 5 januari 2012 11:12
>         To: For openEHR technical discussions
>         Subject: Re: Did anybody implement AQL with a LL parser
>         framework?
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         Hi!
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         
>         We implemented an AQL parser using JavaCC. My colleague Mikael
>         Nystr?m made some transformations to make the published AQL
>         grammar work in JavaCC. Mikael is on vacation right now, but
>         I'm sure he does not mind sharing his experiences once he gets
>         back. 
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         
>         I do think it would be interesting to switch to ANTLR sooner
>         or later in order to share efforts between projects with
>         different implementation/target-languages and because the
>         ANTLRWorks environment http://www.antlr.org/works/index.html
>         looks promising compared to the pretty bad JavaCC-plugin in
>         e.g. Eclipse.
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         
>         Our parser (and thus also the modified grammar) will soon be
>         open sourced so you are free to use it. So if you are not in
>         an extreme hurry I'd suggest using or getting inspiration from
>         what we have already done.
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         
>         Best regards,
>         Erik Sundvall
>         erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/  Tel:
>         +46-13-286733
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 16:37, Seref Arikan
>         <serefarikan at kurumsalteknoloji.com> wrote:
>         
>         Greetings, 
>         The AQL grammar from the wiki has direct and indirect left
>         recursion. Which means without changes in the grammar, LL
>         parser generators (both JavaCC and Anltr) can't generate
>         parsers for this grammar. 
>         
>         I'm curious if anybody has refactored this grammar for LL
>         parser generators. Shinji? Your latest release includes an AQL
>         parser does not it? Could you please share your method? I can
>         always look at the code, but you'd probably save me time :) 
>         
>         I'm interested in experiences of others too. 
>         
>         
>         Kind regards
>         Seref
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         openEHR-technical mailing list
>         openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>         http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>         
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113/f5601aba/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: face-sad.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1057 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113/f5601aba/attachment.png>

Reply via email to