On 11/01/2012 07:55, Heath Frankel wrote: > > Peter, > I believe this unique name rule should be reviewed and revoked. It is > not formally defined, as indicated in your referenced Jira issue its > only stated in the architecture overview in the context of paths which > assumes name is the unique within a container. I have other examples > where it is desirable to get multiple items with the same node-id but > not the entire set and name is the obvious collector. It also causes > issues in renamed templated items which you still want to allow more > than one occurrence of that item. > I believe that path predicates are context specific, some times you > may want to use event time or entry uid for example, and should not be > dictated by the reference model. >
yep. This rule needs to be relaxed in the next release of openEHR. - thomas
