Done: http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/SPECPR-88
-- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 08:46:16 +0100 From: thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: Question about Composition.category Pablo cam you please raise an issue here so we don't forget to address this? thanks - thomas On 04/10/2012 23:36, pablo pazos wrote: Hi Ian, Thanks for the answer. I think having "process" & "etc" in the specs makes a little difficult to understand what values are allowed in the category field. BTW, in the Terminology.xml file, "process" is also present: http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/computable/terminology/terminology.xml <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="431" Rubric="persistent"/> <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="432" Rubric="Composition category"/> <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="433" Rubric="event"/> <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="434" Rubric="process"/> _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20121008/15ba308f/attachment-0001.html>