Done: http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/SPECPR-88

-- 
Kind regards,
Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez
Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos

Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 08:46:16 +0100
From: thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: Question about Composition.category


  
    
  
  
    

      Pablo

      

      cam you please raise an issue here so
      we don't forget to address this?

      

      thanks

      

      - thomas

      

      On 04/10/2012 23:36, pablo pazos wrote:

    
    
      
        
        Hi Ian,
          

          
          Thanks for the answer. I think having "process" &
            "etc" in the specs makes a little difficult to understand
            what values are allowed in the category field. 

            

            BTW, in the Terminology.xml file, "process" is also
            present: 
http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/computable/terminology/terminology.xml
          

          
          
            <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="431" Rubric="persistent"/>
            
            <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="432" Rubric="Composition
                    category"/>
            
            <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="433" Rubric="event"/>
            
            <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="434" Rubric="process"/>
            

              
            
          
        
      
    
  


_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org   
                                  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20121008/15ba308f/attachment-0001.html>

Reply via email to