Hi David
As the aim for all is interoperability of these things, I would hope that the information would be two way. I would suggest getting the new experts to comment on CKM and then derive a 13606 archetype (this is described in the 13606 standard). I would like that to be a future part of CKM but understand this may seem a little too controlling. If we start creating clinical content specifications in lots of places it will not really assist medicine a great deal. We estimate that it is costing health care dearly to do this again, again and again. Particularly when providers are interested in quality and sharing information. That said, I would attribute the work to openEHR, the original authors, contributors and any new expert inputs. The license is to openEHR so I guess it is openEHR that needs attributing if you want to stay with the legal requirement. The SA does mean that you have to share the derived work under a similar license, something that some have been worried about. I am interested in your views on this. Cheers, Sam From: [email protected] [mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of David Moner Sent: Thursday, 22 March 2012 9:33 PM To: OpenEHR clinical discussions; OpenEHR technical discussions Subject: Archetype authoring attribution Hello, Back again with the licensing topic of archetypes, with a real use case. We have been asked to help in creating a set of 13606 archetypes for breast and prostate cancer. Although they will probably incorporate some new requirements, the main source will be some of the openEHR archetypes available at the CKM. Assuming that the have adopted a CC-BY(-SA) license (I cannot recall which is the state of that discussion), the doubts are the following: - Converting the archetype to a new reference model is considered as a derivation? Or the openEHR archetype is considered just as a reference material as could be any textbook or paper? - The author of the new archetype has to be the one of the openEHR archetype (Ian McNicoll btw) or the person who in fact creates the new RM-based archetype? The underlying question here that should be clarified is to define which is the extension of the concept "derived work". David -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120323/38a41369/attachment.html>
