Grahame Grieve wrote: >> well it is the case for the History/Event structure - by definition. If you >> have a situation where it is not the case - there are many! - then this is >> not the data structure to use; just use separate Observations (possibly with >> LINKs between them). > > well, currently, that means that we have to break up what is a simple single > archetype otherwise into a set of archetypes, and we have poor binding between > them.
I don't think Thomas was suggesting multiple archetypes. I think he was saying that you would have multiple data instances of the one OBSERVATION archetype. Peter
