On 13/09/2012 05:15, David Moner wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/9/13 Erik Sundvall <erik.sundvall at liu.se > <mailto:erik.sundvall at liu.se>> > > It would be great if e.g most of the future ISO 13606 version > could be a true subset of openEHR instead of the current confusing > situation. > > > This is something I discussed with Thomas some time ago, it would be > one of the best harmonisation solutions, but probably with a slightly > different interpretation. Since 13606 has more generic classes (eg. > the generic ENTRY can represent all of OBSERVATION, EVALUATION, > INSTRUCTION, ACTION), instead of 13606 being a subset of openEHR I > think that openEHR should be a specialized model of 13606. Obviously > this would require a deep analysis and changes of the models, but that > could be the idea. > > * > *
yep. I have a few more ideas on this not yet posted, to try and reduce gaps. Will do so in the next week or so. - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120915/b19bd268/attachment.html>
