On 05/01/2013 03:24 PM, Peter Gummer wrote:
> Bert Verhees wrote:
>
>> I have a problem with both archetype-editors, I explained a few times on 
>> this list why.
>> Both change archetypes while loading them, f.e. one likes to add node-id's 
>> to datavalues, and the other does not like that.
>> There are some more incompatibilities, between the both. I forgot the 
>> details.
>> Then one is not able to create demographic archetypes, also a problem.
>> ---------
>> Both are not configurable.
>> I would like to have an archetype editor which can be feeded with some 
>> RM-definition, and configured to use it, and then is being able to create 
>> archetypes following that definition.
>> ...
>> Do you know how I create archetypes (I don't if I can someone else having to 
>> do it :), but I work my way in LinkEHR or the Ocean editor, and edit them 
>> manually in a text-editor, with syntax-highlighting.
>
> Hi Bert,
>
> Problems with the Ocean Archetype Editor should be reported to 
> http://www.openehr.org/issues/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AEPR . The Ocean 
> Archetype Editor only gets worked on when we have spare time, or if there is 
> a pressing business requirement for us to fix something in it, so mentioning 
> a problem on a mailing list is not likely to get it fixed.
>
> If you have examples of archetypes generated by LinkEHR that are not handled 
> properly by the Ocean Archetype Editor, please attach them to your problem 
> report.
>
> Alternatively, you could try fixing it yourself. I recall that you compiled 
> it under Mono a few years ago, but you had a problem that there were 
> dependencies on some DLLs that only worked under Windows. We have removed 
> those dependencies, so you should be able to build it successfully under Mono 
> these days.
>
> But I understand that you're a very busy guy yourself, so submitting a 
> problem report would probably be best ;-)

Thanks Peter, I will investigate the problem again, so I can write a 
problem report.

Thanks for removing those dependencies, good that you remember that ;-)

Bert

Reply via email to