By the way, we should use the momentum to also revamp the available metadata. A few ideas:
- Move 'copyright' from language specific information to general metadata (It's not being really translated at the moment). - Move 'references' from other_details to general metadata (It's important enough IMHO). - Information about date of validation, validity time and who validated it. - RM version this archetype was based on. - etc. 2013/4/26 Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>: > On 26/04/2013 04:17, Shinji KOBAYASHI wrote: >> >> Hi Thomas Beale, >> >> At first, I am much sorry about lacking links. >> http://www.rugson.org/pdf/PSRCPattaya2012.pdf >> In this presentation, serialisation formats were compared with >> features and metrics, such as size and (de)serialise performance. >> >> And the second, to address binary data in ODIN format, I think using >> typing system might be good. >> ex. >> my_binary_data = (Binary:Base128)<211234blurblur> >> > > that's not a bad idea at all. I need to think about that.... > > > - thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
