Bert,
I was not clear, but this is is my suggestion
/items[at0008,1]/value/value = Jan
/items[at0008,2]/value/value = Peter
/items[at0009]/value/value = Balkenende
Alessandro
On 19 November 2013 21:08, Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl> wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> I think you propose this?
>
>
> /items[at0008,1]/value/value = Mark
> /items[at0009,2]/value/value = Rutte
>
> regards
> Bert Verhees
>
>
> Alessandro Torrisi schreef op 19-11-2013 20:19:
>
> i would say
>
> /items[at0008,1]/value/value = Mark
> /items[at0008,2]/value/value = Rutte
>
> Alessandro
>
>
>
> On 19 November 2013 13:57, Diego Bosc? <yampeku at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bert,
>>
>> Personally I would use:
>>
>> /items[at0008]/value[1]/value = Jan
>> /items[at0008]/value[2]/value = Peter
>> /items[at0009]/value/value = Balkenende
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> 2013/11/19 Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl>:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I had following interesting discussion.
>> >
>> > Suppose we have a cluster containing name of a person.
>> >
>> > There is a field called firstname, and a field called lastname.
>> >
>> > The problem is concerning the ADL-path, what should be used.
>> >
>> > This is a part of the archetype:
>> >
>> > CLUSTER[at0007] occurrences matches {0..1} matches { -- voornamen
>> > items cardinality matches {0..*; ordered}
>> matches {
>> > ELEMENT[at0008] occurrences matches {0..*}
>> > matches { -- firstname
>> > value matches {
>> > DV_TEXT matches {*}
>> > }
>> > }
>> > ELEMENT[at0009] occurrences matches {0..1}
>> > matches { -- lastname
>> > value matches {
>> > DV_TEXT matches {*}
>> > }
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>> > This is a hypothecical example, only to explain:
>> >
>> > Because at0008 has upper-occurrences of more then 1 ( a person can have
>> more
>> > then one firstnames)
>> > And at0009 has upper-occurrences of 1 (people only have one last-name
>> (in
>> > this hypothetical country))
>> >
>> > If we want to express data in a path/value combination, what would be
>> the
>> > best solution?
>> >
>> > /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan
>> > /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter
>> > /items[at0009]/value/value = Balkenende
>> >
>> > /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan
>> > /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter
>> > /items[at0009][1]/value/value = Balkenende
>> >
>> > /items[at0008][1]/value/value = Jan
>> > /items[at0008][2]/value/value = Peter
>> > /items[at0009][3]/value/value = Balkenende
>> >
>> > Or would another solution be better?
>> > Thanks in advance for suggestions.
>> >
>> > Kind regards
>> > Bert Verhees
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > openEHR-technical mailing list
>> > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>> >
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alessandro Torrisi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing listopenEHR-technical at
> lists.openehr.orghttp://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
--
Alessandro Torrisi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20131120/e30156b8/attachment.html>
