On 22/11/2013 07:00, David Moner wrote: > > > > 2013/11/22 Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl > <mailto:bert.verhees at rosa.nl>> > > > The purpose of the path is solely to indicate to which leafnode in > an archetype a DataValue belongs. > > > > [at0009,1] > > > > > I'm still struggling to understand the reason of all this discussion. > In the previous example, an instance data value (not DataValue) belong > to the node [at0009], that's all even if that node has multiple > occurrences. ADL paths are used to reference object nodes within an > archetype, not instances, and in an archetype every node type is > unique. A different thing is if you are talking about ODIN/dADL paths.
well... we sort of are here. I guess the point is that it makes no sense if the runtime paths for archetyped data are not completely consistent with the pure (design-time) archetype paths, i.e. a clean superset of syntax. - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20131122/a351bcb3/attachment.html>
