There is a test archetype here
<https://github.com/openEHR/adl-archetypes/blob/master/ADL15-reference/features/meta_data/openehr-test_pkg-WHOLE.full_meta_data.v0.0.1.adls>that
shows an example of proposed new meta-data items.
Things to notice:
* 'rm_release=1.0.2' in the top line. Rm_release is now a mandatory
item in ADL 2 (but easy to synthesise in converters)
* 'copyright' is now at the outer level, before it was in the
translatable part, i.e. with 'keywords' etc - now there is only one
copyright statement for an archetype
* 'licence' is a new item
* there are items for 'original_xxx' and 'custodian_xxx' intended to
document the original organisation that created something, and the
current custodian of that thing.
* proposed new blocks for 'ip_acknowledgements' and 'conversion_details'
A question I have is: are the items for original publisher / namespace
and custodian organisation enough?
Currently they are as follows:
original_namespace = <"org.archetypes-r-us">
original_publisher = <"Archetypes R Us">
custodian_namespace = <"org.openehr">
custodian_organisation = <"openEHR Foundation">
However, if we thing we need any more items for these two, we are stuck
with this model - the only place we could put new items would be in the
main 'other_details' block. Should we instead do the following:
original_publisher = <
organisation = <"Archetypes R Us">
namespace = <"org.archetypes-r-us">
other_details = <
["key"] = <"value">
["key"] = <"value">
...
>
>
custodian = <
organisation = <"openEHR Foundation">
namespace = <"org.openehr">
other_details = <
["key"] = <"value">
["key"] = <"value">
...
>
>
This is only slightly more complex, but much more flexible. As we are
finalising the ADL/AOM 2 specifications, this is one of the last issues,
so now is a good time to decide if we need to change this.
It is worth noting that we have done the ip_acknowledgements and
conversion_details (both imminently needed by CIMI) differently:
ip_acknowledgements = <
["loinc"] = <"This content from LOINC? is copyright ? 1995
Regenstrief Institute, Inc. and the LOINC Committee, and available at no
cost under the license at http://loinc.org/terms-of-use";>
["snomedct"] = <"xyz">
>
conversion_details = <
["source_model"] = <"CEM xyz
<http://location.in.clinicalelementmodels.com>">
["tool"] = <"cem2adl v6.3.0">
["time"] = <"2014-11-03T09:05:00">
>
This is because in the first case, the structure is logically a keyed
list of values, where we never know the keys, and in the
'conversion_details' case, because we are not currently sure of the keys
(and maybe we'll never have standard keys for that).
- thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141120/06ec350a/attachment.html>
