Hi Thomas, I am not sure why we can't use other-details for all of these. It doesn't seem critical for processing archetypes, it is only for reference.
Regards Heath On 21 Nov 2014, at 1:21 am, "Thomas Beale" <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com<mailto:thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>> wrote: There is a test archetype here <https://github.com/openEHR/adl-archetypes/blob/master/ADL15-reference/features/meta_data/openehr-test_pkg-WHOLE.full_meta_data.v0.0.1.adls> that shows an example of proposed new meta-data items. Things to notice: * 'rm_release=1.0.2' in the top line. Rm_release is now a mandatory item in ADL 2 (but easy to synthesise in converters) * 'copyright' is now at the outer level, before it was in the translatable part, i.e. with 'keywords' etc - now there is only one copyright statement for an archetype * 'licence' is a new item * there are items for 'original_xxx' and 'custodian_xxx' intended to document the original organisation that created something, and the current custodian of that thing. * proposed new blocks for 'ip_acknowledgements' and 'conversion_details' A question I have is: are the items for original publisher / namespace and custodian organisation enough? Currently they are as follows: original_namespace = <"org.archetypes-r-us"> original_publisher = <"Archetypes R Us"> custodian_namespace = <"org.openehr"> custodian_organisation = <"openEHR Foundation"> However, if we thing we need any more items for these two, we are stuck with this model - the only place we could put new items would be in the main 'other_details' block. Should we instead do the following: original_publisher = < organisation = <"Archetypes R Us"> namespace = <"org.archetypes-r-us"> other_details = < ["key"] = <"value"> ["key"] = <"value"> ... > > custodian = < organisation = <"openEHR Foundation"> namespace = <"org.openehr"> other_details = < ["key"] = <"value"> ["key"] = <"value"> ... > > This is only slightly more complex, but much more flexible. As we are finalising the ADL/AOM 2 specifications, this is one of the last issues, so now is a good time to decide if we need to change this. It is worth noting that we have done the ip_acknowledgements and conversion_details (both imminently needed by CIMI) differently: ip_acknowledgements = < ["loinc"] = <"This content from LOINC(r) is copyright (c) 1995 Regenstrief Institute, Inc. and the LOINC Committee, and available at no cost under the license at http://loinc.org/terms-of-use";> ["snomedct"] = <"xyz"> > conversion_details = < ["source_model"] = <"CEM xyz <http://location.in.clinicalelementmodels.com><http://location.in.clinicalelementmodels.com>"> ["tool"] = <"cem2adl v6.3.0"> ["time"] = <"2014-11-03T09:05:00"> > This is because in the first case, the structure is logically a keyed list of values, where we never know the keys, and in the 'conversion_details' case, because we are not currently sure of the keys (and maybe we'll never have standard keys for that). - thomas _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141120/83745581/attachment-0001.html>
