2014-10-02 10:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>:

>
>
> I think the key things to remember in resolving this are how the various
> artefacts get used, which helps figure where 'adaptation' actually exists.
> I can think of the following:
>
>    - archetype => template => software application
>       - the simplest standard practice
>       - this is USE not ADAPTATION
>        - archetype => specialise => template => software application
>     - the next simplest standard practice
>       - this is USE not ADAPTATION
>    - archetype => software application
>       - not a great idea in general - it means that the 'archetypes' are
>       not really maximal re-usable data sets, but something like predefined
>       templates. However, someone is bound to do this, and produce a good 
> product
>       from it.
>       - this is USE not ADAPTATION
>    - archetype => forking => modification => templating => software
>    application
>     - Result: probably non-interoperable data; but may occur for
>       pragmatic reasons, e.g. openEHR is too slow to make fixes to the 
> archetype.
>       - this is ADAPTATION
>
> According to the CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence text only the last of these paths
> means that the final software or other result is an 'adaptation' of the
> original archetype, which means that the CC-BY-SA license applies, IF YOU
> PUBLICLY SHARE THE ARTEFACT.
>
>

Just to be clear, I repeat that that is exactly what I would like to
interpret. But if I read the legal texts trying to be objective (and again,
not being a lawyer!) it is normal that doubts arise. If I generate a
validation software that includes validation rules from the archetype
constraints, that is arguably an adaptation, not just a use.

And it is also important to note that if you sell a software you are also
publicly sharing it. Publicly share does not imply for free, but outside of
a personal use.

I fully support the comments of Grahame. Probably the solution is to go
just for the simpler option and don't worry about what others do with their
own business.


-- 
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner

Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia - 46022 (Espa?a)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141002/b357fa49/attachment.html>

Reply via email to