> On 31 okt. 2014, at 08:39, David Moner <damoca at gmail.com> wrote: > > I will explain it in another way. > > acNNNN codes are used as "placeholder constraints", i.e. a kind of link to a > query or subset in a terminological systems that defines the possible > instance values of a coded attribute. > > My question was: Is it needed to be always a link to a subset? Cannot we use > acNNNN to define bindings to specific terminological codes explicitly > enumerated, without the need of defining a subset in the terminological > system in advance?
Use case: to define an ?ad-hoc? list of codes that might apply and from which one can be choosen without the need to use the terminology service? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141031/30b7f632/attachment.html>
