On 31-10-14 10:32, Gerard Freriks wrote: > Use case: to define an ?ad-hoc? list of codes that might apply and > from which one can be choosen without the need to use the terminology > service? Exactly, many times there are only a few codes needed in an archetype/dataset and the need to have a terminology-service available to resolve some codes in order to use some archetypes would be an overkill-requirement, which could also possible unnecessary slow a system down.
- Defining multiple constraint bindings in AOM/ADL 1.4 David Moner
- Defining multiple constraint bindings in AOM/ADL 1.4 Thomas Beale
- Defining multiple constraint bindings in AOM/ADL 1... David Moner
- Defining multiple constraint bindings in AOM/A... Thomas Beale
- Defining multiple constraint bindings in A... David Moner
- Defining multiple constraint bindings... Thomas Beale
- Defining multiple constraint bind... Bert Verhees
- Defining multiple constraint bindings in AOM/A... Gerard Freriks
- Defining multiple constraint bindings in A... Bert Verhees

