Thanks Thomas, for the clarification. Very useful. Bert Op 13 aug. 2015 06:26 schreef "Thomas Beale" < [email protected]>:
> > Dave, > > I'll try to answer a few. > > Firstly, please treat the active specifications as what you find by going > to the home page 'Specifications' button (top left), i.e. the HTML specs > here > <http://www.openehr.org/programs/specification/releases/currentbaseline#ADL2> > . > > Second point, 'ADL 1.5' was what we used for a long time as the moniker > for 'next generation ADL', until we realised that we introduced breaking > changes due to CIMI, OMG/AML and openEHR development work. So 'ADL / AOM 2' > is the 'modern' archetype formalism. > > We never released any interim version, although some people think we > should, as per this page > <https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/ADL/ADL+1.4+Migration+Roadmap> > . > > The ADL / AOM 2 specs referred to above are not yet quite complete - there > are a few more additions to the documents, and 2 very minor potential > semantic changes - semantic slots and smarter annotations. I would expect > these specs to be ready for release formal TRIAL in the next 4 weeks. > > Why does ADL2/AOM2 exist? It addresses various limitations in ADL1.4, > including lack of proper modelling for specialisation, templating, proper > versioning and id rules, and proper value sets. A full list is here > <https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/ADL/Evolution+from+ADL+1.4>. > > The ADL Workbench <http://www.openehr.org/downloads/ADLworkbench/home>will > reliably (in most cases) convert ADL 1.4 archetypes to ADL 2 form. This > transform is not trivial, so anyone who wants to do this conversion should > use this tool, or the command line version. > > CIMI is using only ADL/AOM 2, and CIMI will become a working group of some > kind in HL7 (agreed but not finalised yet), so HL7 will potentially use ADL > 2 at some point (but I assume jut the CIMI workgroup for some time). > > ADL/AOM2 is the basis for the OMG Archetype Modelling Language (AML) > specification, which has entered the standards track a few months ago. > > On the ground in openEHR implementation space, ADL 1.4 is being used. New > tools that are internally ADL 2 will / do generate ADL 1.4 OPTs to enable > these systems to keep running. The ADL Workbench doesn't yet do this but > will. > > There is an XML Schema for ADL / AOM 2 here > <https://github.com/openEHR/specifications/tree/master/ITS/AOM2/XML-schema>, > also reachable from the current specifications page > <http://www.openehr.org/programs/specification/releases/currentbaseline>. > > The tougher question to answer is when systems will move to ADL 2. THere > are two questions: EHR systems, and tools. Tools can move faster, and are > already being changed. CKM also incorporates some ADL 2 features already. > EHR systems will move more slowly and carefully for obvious reasons, which > is why we need ADL 1.4 OPT support in next gen tools. I would expect some > vendors to eventually support ADL 1.4 and ADL2, and existing ADL 1.4 based > deployments may stay on ADL 1.4. > > - thomas > > On 12/08/2015 04:32, Barnet David (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION > CENTRE) wrote: > > All > > > > Hope everyone is well. > > I have a few questions on ADL versions > > > > Is there a general view as to when archetypes will be created in an ADL > version other than version 1.4? > > > > I’ve sampled CKMs from various countries & found all archetypes (that I > sampled) were in the ADL 1.4 format. > > > > Some questions: > > Is anyone planning to use anything other than ADL 1.4 in the near future? > > > > How will CKMs cope with multiple ADL versions in a single CKM? > > > > When will tools be available to create archetypes in 1.5 and 2.0? > > > > How will the export format change from ADL 1.4 to 1.5 and 2.0? > > > > Will I be able to import an archetype in 1.5 or 2.0 into my CKM? > > > > Is there an XML schema available for 1.5 and 2.0? > > > > When do we expect archetypes in 1.5 & 2.0 to be the norm? > > > > What’s the driver to move to archetypes created to DL version 1.5 or 2.0? > > > > Are all the answers in the published document > http://www.openehr.org/releases/trunk/architecture/am/adl2.pdf ? > > > > Regards > > > > Dave Barnet > Health and Social Care Information Centre > > NHS England, UK > > > > -- > [image: Ocean Informatics] <http://www.oceaninformatics.com> > *Thomas Beale Chief Technology Officer* > +44 7792 403 613 Specification Program, *open*EHR > <http://www.openehr.org/> > Honorary Research Fellow, UCL <http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/> > Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS <http://www.bcs.org.uk/> > Health IT blog <http://wolandscat.net/category/health-informatics/> [image: > View Thomas Beale's profile on LinkedIn] > <https://uk.linkedin.com/pub/thomas-beale/0/217/68a> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
