Again. Answer the question ‘Who owns the specifications of openEHR, looking at the quotes I provided? The answer is: UCL owns the IP rights and licensing conditions. Members of, participants in, openEHR gremia, do not.
And that is why I call openEHR specifications proprietary. According to the definition of ‘open standard’, openEHR is an open Standard but owned by as single company. I know for certain that this fact prohibited serious business in some European countries, some years ago. Because of the licensing and dependency on proprietary specifications, the artifacts produced were not controllable by the user/customer. This was their reason, after legal consultation, not to use software based on openEHR specifications. Gerard > On Sep 3, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Koray Atalag <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think Silje’s explanation is crystal clear on this matter – so what exactly > your problem is Gerard with openEHR? Can you give a concrete example where > other SDOs you mention are better placed wrt to freedom? > > Cheers, > > -koray
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
