It is not a numbers game. Members/users need to own it. CEN, ISO, HL7, SNOMED, WHO, all have members that own the IP. These organizations are real Associations.
Gerard > On Sep 3, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Seref Arikan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks for your response. > Based on this response and another one you gave to Silje, do you think you > could give a number of owners of a standard, which you'd consider to be > sufficient to make a standard not proprietary? In layman terms: how many > owners should a standard have so that you would not call it proprietary? > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:11 AM, "Gerard Freriks (privé)" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > In the case of CEN, ISO, HL7, SNOMED all members are the owner. > > Gerard > > > >> On Sep 3, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Seref Arikan <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> Just to clarify my understanding of your understanding of the term: would >> you say HL7 and Snomed CT are proprietary ? > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
