Again: you are explicitly ignoring availability and freedom to use arguments, the main point here... This is my last message on this discussion, I'll continue doing something more productive :)
-- Kind regards, Eng. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez http://cabolabs.com Subject: Re: Advantage of ISO From: [email protected] Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:19:35 +0200 CC: [email protected] To: [email protected] I shared with you my definitions and my argument.This provided my context. In principle: definitions are universal in nature and generally applicable in many contexts. Gerard On Sep 3, 2015, at 3:33 PM, [email protected] wrote: Definitions are context dependant, but that's not the point... you ignored the true argument about availavility and constraints/freedom to use. Sent from my LG Mobile ------ Original message------From: Gerard Freriks (privé)Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 04:07To: For openEHR technical discussions;Subject:Re: Advantage of ISOI think that definitions are generally valid. On Sep 3, 2015, at 8:38 AM, pablo pazos <[email protected]> wrote:I think that definition doesn't apply to a standard / spec. IMO when we talk about standards, we focus on the ability to use it and let others use it, and the constraints / freedoms in that area, not in who is the owner.-- Kind regards,Eng. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrezhttp://cabolabs.com
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
