Can someone help to take me off the list.  I have signed into the list and
unsubscribe and still unsuccessful.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Barnet David (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
INFORMATION CENTRE) <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have a question about the XML schema for archetypes based on ADL version
> 1.4
>
>
>
> The set of schemas we are using to validate XML archetype exports are 1.0.1
>
> <!-- openEHR Release 1.0.1 OpenehrProfile XML schema -->
>
> <!-- openEHR Release 1.0.1 Archetype  XML schema -->
>
> <!-- openEHR Release 1.0.1 BaseTypes  XML schema -->
>
> ETC..
>
>
>
> The issue we are getting is that sometimes an archetype has a <uid> tag.
> All those downloaded from our CKM (ckm.hscic.gov.uk) have this tag, but
> it’s not present on all archetypes from other CKMs (which may be why this
> could be a new issue).
>
>
>
> The schema is expecting the <uid> tag before the <archetype_id> tag
>
>             <xs:complexType name="ARCHETYPE">
>
>                         <xs:complexContent>
>
>                                     <xs:extension base="AUTHORED_RESOURCE
> ">
>
>                                                 <xs:sequence>
>
>                                                             *<*
> *xs:element** name**="**uid**"** type**="**HIER_OBJECT_ID**"** minOccurs*
> *="**0**"/>*
>
>                                                             <xs:element
> name="archetype_id" type="ARCHETYPE_ID"/>
>
>                                                             <xs:element
> name="adl_version" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
>
>
>
> However, in the XML instances, the <uid> (if present) appears after the
> <adl_version> tag
>
>             <archetype_id>
>
>                         <value>
> openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.newborn_birth_details.v0</value>
>
>             </archetype_id>
>
>             <adl_version>1.4</adl_version>
>
>             *<**uid**>**7f716e0e-5fa8-4fec-942d-208764409b07**</**uid**>*
>
>
>
> Further, changing the schema to change the expected tag order to match the
> XML instances shows up a further issue in that the format of <uid>
> (according to the schema) should use a <value> tag like this
>
>             <uid>
>
>                         <value>7f716e0e-5fa8-4fec-942d-208764409b07</value
> >
>
>             </uid>
>
>
>
> Are we using an out of date set of schema? Or are these known issues? Have
> people corrected the schema for their own use (if so could I have a copy
> please)?
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Dave Barnet
> Interoperability Lead
>
> Interoperability Specifications
>
> Health & Social Care Information Centre
> [email protected]
> www.hscic.gov.uk
>
>
>
>
> ********************************************************************************************************************
>
> This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the
> intended recipient please inform the
> sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or
> take any action in reliance on its contents:
> to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> Thank you for your co-operation.
>
> NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS
> staff in England and Scotland
> NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive
> information with NHSmail and GSi recipients
> NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be
> accessed anywhere
>
>
> ********************************************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>



-- 
-Julian
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to