On 27-11-15 10:27, Thomas Beale wrote:
If people want specific changes to the specifications, please raise a
Problem Report in the usual place
<https://openehr.atlassian.net/projects/SPECPR/issues/SPECPR-132?filter=allopenissues>.
Otherwise we don't know what the specific shortcomings are.
I would do that, now it comes to mind, but first I wanted to discuss it,
because the different approach to demographics through the years, also
in 13606, made me unsure about their legitimacy as ultrastructure.
I am happy to read that this will be changed in RM 1.0.3, so reporting
it would not be necessary now, I guess.
Thanks for your reply
Bert
- thomas
On 27/11/2015 09:02, Bert Verhees wrote:
On 27-11-15 09:56, Dmitry Baranov wrote:
I agree that demographic details can be expressed via archetypes.
Actors/Participation/Names etc are elaborated well in HL7 CDA spec,
by the way
That is a point, why is it not like that in OpenEHR or EN13606?
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
--
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
