Hi all,
I am looking at this error message from
http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/AOM2/AOM2.html#_validity_rules
*
VARCN*: archetype concept validity. The |/node_id/| of the root object
of the archetype must be of the form |id1{.1}*|, where the number of
|.1| components equals the specalisation depth, and must be defined in
the terminology.
/(which has a spelling-error in "specalisation", it should be
"specialisation")
/My first question:
How can the parser know the specialization-depth?
When I look at the grammar, it seems not possible to layer the
specializationSection
So it can only check that it is a specialization.
Or am I overseeing something
My second question:
There is another thing, only small, thing, not very important, but I
thought, I mention it anyway.
In the grammar specialization is spelled in the US way ( in
specialization_section : SYM_SPECIALIZE archetype_ref ;), while in the
error-messages specialisation is spelled in the UK-way (in VASID).
Is there a preferred spelling for when handling texts which belong to
software-definitions?
Thanks
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
