In AOM/ADL 2 this is not true anymore, so I fear we have lost the only way to know the specialization depth of an archetype (without navigating through all its parents).
2015-12-16 10:52 GMT+01:00 Diego Boscá <[email protected]>: > The concept_id part from the archetype_hrid shows all the parents of a > given node (or at least did in 1.4) > > 2015-12-16 10:42 GMT+01:00 Bert Verhees <[email protected]>: > > On 16-12-15 09:50, Diego Boscá wrote: > >> > >> Parsing current archetype identifiers you can know the specialization > >> depth and compare it with root node_id. > > > > > > Hi Diego, > > > > Thanks for your answer, and I hope you will answer my follow up question > > > > I thought the the versionId's in the archetype_hrid denote the > > corrections/versions on an archetype. > > But maybe I misunderstand that concept. > > > > Or are you referring to something else? > > > > Bert > > > > > > > >> > >> 2015-12-16 9:42 GMT+01:00 Bert Verhees <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I am looking at this error message from > >>> > >>> > http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/AOM2/AOM2.html#_validity_rules > >>> > >>> VARCN: archetype concept validity. The node_id of the root object of > the > >>> archetype must be of the form id1{.1}*, where the number of .1 > components > >>> equals the specalisation depth, and must be defined in the terminology. > >>> (which has a spelling-error in "specalisation", it should be > >>> "specialisation") > >>> > >>> My first question: > >>> How can the parser know the specialization-depth? > >>> When I look at the grammar, it seems not possible to layer the > >>> specializationSection > >>> So it can only check that it is a specialization. > >>> > >>> Or am I overseeing something > >>> > >>> My second question: > >>> There is another thing, only small, thing, not very important, but I > >>> thought, I mention it anyway. > >>> In the grammar specialization is spelled in the US way ( in > >>> specialization_section : SYM_SPECIALIZE archetype_ref ;), while in the > >>> error-messages specialisation is spelled in the UK-way (in VASID). > >>> > >>> Is there a preferred spelling for when handling texts which belong to > >>> software-definitions? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Bert > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> openEHR-technical mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> openEHR-technical mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> > >> > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openEHR-technical mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3ª planta Valencia – 46022 (España)
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
